Elon Musk Misses Fat Target For Cost Cuts: His Own Company

Blockhead
03-07

The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, otherwise known as DOGE, is seeking to cut inefficiency in the U.S. government. But maybe Musk could start with a target closer to home: his own Tesla (TSLA).

X NOW PLAYING This Is What Warren Buffett Looks For In Winning Stocks – And Why Tesla Didn't Make The Cut

Tesla, a leading maker of electric vehicles, is one of the most bloated S&P 500 companies based on an often used measure of productivity: revenue per employee. Each Tesla employee hauled in $777,384 in revenue in the past 12 months, says an Investor's Business Daily analysis of data from S&P Global Market Intelligence and MarketSurge. That's well below the $1.5 million pulled in by S&P 500 employees on average.

Such statistics raise questions about Tesla CEO Elon Musk's ability to control costs at his own company — much less government agencies he didn't have a hand in creating. And that's not to mention the potential distraction of running DOGE while Tesla shareholders watch shares fall.

"The worry of the Street is that Musk dedicating so much time (even more than we expected) to DOGE takes away from his time at Tesla in such a crucial moment and year for the company," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives in mid-February.

Elon Musk: Don't Blame The S&P 500 Industry

Don't blame the bloat at Tesla on the labor-intensive nature of automaking. Tesla's productivity falls short of both of its domestic carmaking rivals. Revenue per employee is much higher at both General Motors (GM) and Ford (F).

Each GM employee hauled in $1.16 million in the past 12 months, or nearly 49% more than Tesla employees did. Meanwhile, Ford employees represented $1.08 million each, or 39% more than Tesla. Tesla would either need to cut a third of its workforce or boost revenue by nearly 50% with the same number of employees to match GM's productivity.

And Tesla is nowhere near being a role model by this measure in the S&P 500 either. Its revenue per employee is far below the S&P 500's productivity champ, VICI Properties (VICI). The real estate firm's employees represent revenue of $142.6 million each on average.

Tesla's numbers don't look much better vs. the S&P 500 sectors, either. Tesla's revenue per employee is below average in six of the 11 S&P 500 sectors. And it's only 28% better than the average $604,804 revenue per employee in the consumer discretionary sector, in which it belongs.

Tesla Shares Slide With Musk's Focus

The problem for Tesla shareholder is that the more involved Musk gets with DOGE, the more the stock falls.

Shares of Tesla are down more than 35% this year, much worse than the 11.4% drop at GM and 2.7% fall at Ford. Tesla shares are now nearly 47% below their 52-week high. GM is only off 22.9% and Ford 35.1%.

Tesla stock in late February and early March broke below potential floors at the 325-360 price range, and then the 300 level. It is now fighting to hold the 200-day line, around 279 — a crucial level of technical support.

Tesla investors might hope Musk focuses on them again — and less on DOGE — so they can see more efficiency with their capital.

How Bloated Is Tesla?

Company Ticker Revenue last 12 months (billions) Employees Revenue per employee
General Motors GM $187.4 162,000 $1,157,049
Ford Motor F $184.99 171,000 $1,081,825
Tesla TSLA $97.7 125,665 $777,384
S&P 500 $1,571,601
Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, IBD
Follow Matt Krantz on X (Twitter) @mattkrantz

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Five Reasons To Watch This Palantir Peer. A Pending Breakout Is Just One.

Yes, Tesla Is Back. But Funds Absolutely Adore These 6 Stocks.

How To Invest In Nvidia And Beyond In 2025: Draw Lines, Not Conclusions

Find The Next Palantir Or Hot IPO In 2025. Here's How.

Find And Analyze Top Growth Stocks With IBD Leaderboard

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10