President Donald Trump announced a 90-day pause on some tariffs. Meanwhile, the trade dispute with China is heating up.

In this podcast, Motley Fool analyst Jason Moser and host Ricky Mulvey discuss:

• The market's extreme reactions to tariff news.
• China's "nuclear option" for the U.S. economy.
• The key themes coming up this earnings season.
• Looking for opportunities in an uncertain environment.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This video was recorded on April 9, 2025

Ricky Mulvey: Buckle up. This trade war might be a long ride. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Back with me today. I saw him in person a few days ago, but it's good to see you on the Internet. Jason Moser, thanks for being here.

Jason Moser: Ricky, I think I like seeing you more in person, man, but still great to see you today anyway. Glad you got back safely.

Ricky Mulvey: Got back safely. Okay to see you on the Internet. Better to see you in your physical form and know that you're a real person.

Jason Moser: I'm with you.

Ricky Mulvey: Twelve minutes before we were going to record this show. Something happened. I got a whole outline. Twelve minutes before we got a truth social post. At real Donald Trump on truth, truth posted, basically that based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the world's markets, I'm hereby raising the tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125% effective immediately. At some point, hopefully in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the United States and other countries is no longer sustainable or acceptable. This is what the market got excited about. Conversely, and based on the fact that more than 75 countries have called representatives of the United States Yada Yada, to negotiate a solution to the subjects being discussed relative to trade, trade barriers, tariffs, currency manipulation, and non monetary tariffs, and that these countries have not at my strong suggestion, retaliated in any way, shape, or form against the United States, I have authorized a 90 day pause and a substantially lowered reciprocal tariff during this period of 10% also effective immediately, thank you for your attention to this matter. Always good to be thanked when your 401K is getting rocked a little bit,

Jason, thank you for your attention during that time. Markets are celebrating this announcement. I know you haven't had a whole lot of time to prepare, but what is your first blush reaction to this tariff pause at the majority of the World.

Jason Moser: I think the pause actually sounds like it could be the title of a Seinfeld episode. The pause. I don't know. Maybe I'm just a Seinfeld nerd and it feels right there. The nature of what we've been going through over the last several days. It has been very emotional for a lot of investors. It's been very difficult stretch for a lot of investors, particularly newer investors who have not been through these types of stretches. But we talk about this often, and I think it just bears repeating. We talk about staying invested in the merits, the virtue in doing that, because the facts are that oftentimes the worst stays in the market.

Are followed up very shortly thereafter by some of the best days in the market. If you're not invested during those best days, you really are killing your returns. I'm going to repeat myself here. But going back and just looking at the data over the last, what, 30 years, if you just missed out on the ten best days of the market, your returns basically get cut in half. If you amp that up to 30 days, if you miss the 30 best days, your returns get cut by close to 80%. It just really, I think, speaks to. It's a testament to why we invest the way we invest here at the full, taking that long view, making sure we get invested and stay invested because we know there are going to be bad days, but we also know there are going to be a lot of great days. This seems like obviously we have not closed yet, but this does seem like a headline that's going to stick, so I would imagine we should finish up with probably one of those better days today, and that for investors should feel pretty good, at least.

Ricky Mulvey: Hear me out. You had the contest. You could have the pause. I could see a way where George somehow insults a trade representative of another country and incites a tariff war that he finds himself in the middle of that he has to reverse in some way. You could do that if you want to bring that show back in 2025.

Jason Moser: Let me listen. Art Vandelay was an exporter or importer. Was he a exporter? Is one or the other, but, yeah, point remains.

Ricky Mulvey: When we were at full Palooza, that's our all company event, where we were for the past couple of days because everyone who works on the show was at the all company event. That's why we were off. It was an interesting time to see our colleagues, but also to watch the market where this 90 day pause was actually hinted at on, I believe, Monday, where it becomes a tweet that's on some lower ranked ex finance account that gets picked up by other accounts that then gets picked up by CNBC. It's a headline trillions of dollars in movement in the stock market. Then the White House comes out and says, No, that's fake news. We're not negotiating. These tariffs are in effect. We had that roller coaster from plus 4% to -1% in one day.

Now we're having trillions of dollars moving again on this truth social post. This is a roller coaster ride that is a market driven president driven return. Are there any lessons that you're taking from that, just the sheer violence in the market happening right now?

Jason Moser: Lessons, yeah, well I think obviously, that initial it has obviously been a very volatile time. That initial post seemed to be based on something where Bessant said something to the extent of the administration is going to do whatever the administration is going to do. Then somehow that was parsed and interpreted as like, well, there's going to be a pause. Then someone gets out there on the social media. They say there's going to be a 90 day pause.

It then goes viral, and of course, the markets react immediately because stuff just gets picked up so quickly. I think for me honestly, it's a good reminder of you have to be able to take everything with a grain of salt and make sure that you don't overreact or react too quickly because oftentimes, when it comes to financial media or when it comes to even social media, people love to be able to be the first one to break the story. That's just like I want to be the one that breaks this story. There are often times where it's the case where it's actually not a story at all, and it turned out to be that that was not correct. There was not a 90 day pause announced at that time. Then we saw the markets quickly correct again because we found out it was flawed information. I think to me, it goes back to that old Silicon Valley axiom, move fast and break things. I think for investors, we need to look at it from the other side of the coin there, move slowly. Don't get emotional.

Don't sit there and just make hasty decisions based on something that you are not even sure whether it may or may not be the case, because in that case, it turned out to be not true. Now, we've seen today where it does seem like this information we've gotten is verified and actually is true. But if you made a hasty decision based on that information yesterday, you could have really put yourself into a hole that had been very difficult to climb out of.

Ricky Mulvey: It was a rumor. It was fake news, then it was real news. I'm not about to throw stones here. I made two mistakes on the show last week that I want to correct now when we were first doing the day after liberation Day. Which liberation Day seems much longer ago than about a week ago. I didn't give enough context that one of the trade barriers that was being punished were trade deficits, which can be a good thing. I have a trade deficit with the Spotify corporation. I have a trade deficit with Costco. I'm trying to break this stuff down and basically, mentioning that dairy from the US to Canada gets this crazy tariff if it's above quota. In 2024, the US exported more than a billion dollars in dairy products to Canada, and currently, American producers do not export enough dairy to meet the Canadian tariff quota. There's different issues with non monetary tariffs, but you're trying to take all of this information in and deliver it to listeners. I made a couple of mistakes last week that I'm correcting right now, and you know what? It's good to be here and not see NBC where we're not moving trillions and trillions of dollars, Jason.

Jason Moser: Ricky, I think that's a great lesson for people, by the way, we all get things wrong in being able to say that can make all the difference in the world. I think it makes you think a little bit more going forward and investing. We have to admit we get things wrong all the time. That's part of the deal. But once you get to the point where you can actually make those mistakes and embrace those inevitable mistakes, I think it ultimately makes you a much stronger investor going forward because you know that you're learning, you're keeping an open mind and being willing to change your mind when the facts change. To me, that is a key part of being a good investor. Stay humble.

Ricky Mulvey: For newer listeners, I think we're getting an influx of newer listeners that just want to find out what's going on, and there's a feeling that markets are moving on these truth posts, charts, headlines about phone calls between the president and other world leaders. I'm going to get political for a sec. Our president does have a meme coin. He is involved in the markets. I think there can be a feeling that the stock market is rigged, and this is one big casino, especially as I'm looking at these big movements. For a newer listener, for a newer investor, what would you say to them if they're having that feeling right now? Because in some ways it's not entirely wrong.

Jason Moser: No, I don't think it is. I think in today's day and age, with things like meme coins and meme stocks and stonks and all that stuff, it can definitely feel more rigged or more like a casino than it did perhaps 20 years ago. I get it. It can feel that way sometimes. I think part of it really boils down to understanding what game you as the individual investor are playing. Because in most cases, we are just not playing the same game as your money managers and big institutions out there. It reminds me, it takes me back to that old Ben Graham saw where, he says, In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine. This really is true.

We are focused on being owners of businesses over time that will continue to get heavier, in a good way. But we have no edge when it comes to getting in and out of positions. There's so much information that flows so quickly, we just simply aren't privy to it. Then the costs that come with being wrong in the trading game are simply not worth it, when you're trying to trade you're wrong an awful lot of times. It just doesn't make a lot of sense. Now, if you look at the chart, it tells the tale. Sure, the S&P is well, before this 90 day pause was announced to me is down around 15% year to date. It's only up maybe 11% over the last three years. But look over the last 10 years. It's up 140%. Over the last 30 years, it's up 882%. Now, there are a lot of bumps along that journey, of course. But getting invested, and then the key here, staying invested is the only way that you can ensure that you'll actually be a part of that.

Ricky Mulvey: Our co founder, David Gardner is on X. I encourage you to follow him. He's our chief rulebreaker. He wrote, "In my 58 years, not sure I can remember a market drop more akin to a self inflicted gunshot wound. Wound, mind you. It's a two day, actually two month drop. Let's do even more tariffs. Am I right? We got a good thing going. Pour it on. Sarcasm is the wit of fools". I think there's two elements here I want to talk to you about. We talk about a lot of market crashes in the past lessons from them. Some things are the same, the feelings of panic, people wanting to move to cash, people wanting to trade more often when they're experiencing the pain of seeing months and months of hard work vanish in their 401K and stock portfolios. What seems to be different this time is that it is not systemic. It's not like 2008. It's not like the carry trade, even from a couple of months ago. What's it mean for stock investors that the market dropped and the ups and downs we're seeing right now is self inflicted and not systemic?

Jason Moser: Well, I think this is something where ultimately, what that means, this is something that there was a choice in what to do, and also how to do it. You can imagine if we weren't going through all of this tariff stuff, then the market likely wouldn't be performing the way it's been performing over the last few months. We might end up being in the same position we are today. Who knows? But the volatility, I have to imagine would have been far lower. It's funny just based on the timing of this because of this 90 day pause that just came out. But imagine if a headline came out tomorrow saying these tariffs are suspended. Indefinitely or 90 days or whatever and countries are negotiating ways to move forward on a more sustainable path together. That would certainly have an impact, and lo and behold, we saw this headline that just came out, and that at least I think has the marks encouraged that we might be on that path for productive negotiations toward more sustainable solutions.

Ricky Mulvey: What would you say to the investor who sees today's very large market increase says, this is my chance to get out for a little bit. We just had one of the best days, and this is going to be followed by more tit for tat trade war negotiations with China, which is still heating up despite the large increase. That could be very bad for the US economy. I want to get more cash or I want to get out of my US stock position and put myself into more international equities.

Jason Moser: Yeah, I think a lot of this. First and foremost, I would encourage folks granted the headline today has obviously had a very positive impact on markets. I would not say that, Okay, well, everything's taken care of. Now, problem solved because I don't think that's going to be the case. I think we're going to see more volatility as time goes on here, but I do think a lot of this boils down to what stage of your investing life that you're in. We talked about this on the show before. If you're younger and you're working and you're going to grow your wealth mode, well getting out of the market makes zero sense, and makes no sense whatsoever. You need to continue to add, continue to diversify your holdings as well as you can in order to offer some stability there to help offset some of this volatility. Dividend stocks. I know they're really boring sounding, Ricky, but dividend stocks are great for investors of all ages. Keep that in mind. If you're in more protect your wealth mode. You're a little bit older, you're looking toward retirement, you need to make sure you're protecting that wealth.

Well, then absolutely, you need to make sure that you're allocated accordingly and have more stability in your portfolio. The cash is always nice to have, and it's a nice way to hedge these downturns. It's also a good reminder to make sure that your money you know that you're going to need over the next 3-5 years. If you've got college tuition bills to pay or whatever else it may be, something over the course of the next three to five years, if you know you need that money, probably shouldn't have that money in the market, or at the very least, it should be in a stable instrument that while offers lower returns, it isn't subject to the vagaries of the market.

Ricky Mulvey: We're going to talk about the trade war heating up with China and what's going on with Walmart just after this.

Jane Perles: As a longtime foreign correspondent, I've worked in lots of places, nowhere as important to the world as China. But these days, few journalists are able to get the inside story. That's because China has shut the door to much of the media. I'm Jane Perles, former Beijing bureau chief for the New York Times. On Face-Off the US versus China, we're trying to break through. We'll talk about Trump and Xi Jinping, AI, TikTok, and even Hollywood. New episodes of Face-Off are available now wherever you get your podcasts.

Ricky Mulvey: J Mo, we got too much news today. No B segment, we're sticking to our A segment outline. The trade war with China continues to heat up. According to the Wall Street Journal, this was before the 125% tariff from the United States a few minutes ago, China said it was going to increase tariffs on all US imports to 84%. But the thing that's important for this is that it may go beyond tariffs, and the situation may not just be import/export duties. It could go to other things, it could go to export controls of critical minerals used to make chips, could be more regulatory investigations to punish US companies, blacklist more US companies from the Chinese market, and the big one, which is a economic nuclear option, is that as of January, China had about $761 billion in US government bonds. There is a nuclear option where they just want to sell all of those into the market and crush the price of US bonds, which increases the interest rates on those bonds, that's the one I'm worried about. How about you?

Jason Moser: I wouldn't say that I'm worried, but I'm really glad that you framed that the way you did, because I think what you did is you made the point that this is a very complex issue with a lot of moving parts. But to the bond question specifically, I wouldn't say I'm worried, but it's something to watch for sure. I mean, normally, during these volatile times, I mean, we would see a flight to safety, and money would be flowing from higher risk instruments like stocks to more risk free type instruments like government bonds. But there are certainly some questions regarding bonds today, particularly as those prices continue to fall. I mean, there are a couple of different perspectives. There's this conversation about the basis trade, for example, where the basis trade is basically the basis, the difference between the price of a government bond and its future contract, which is an agreement to buy that bond at a later date for a specific price. Hedge funds institutional money when they see a meaningful delta there, they'll buy the cheaper bond and then they'll short the more expensive future contract in order to try to play a little bit an arbitrage deal.

At some point when the prices converge, then they will go ahead and cash out and make a little bit of a profit there. I think it's interesting to know in regard to this basis trade, Apollo Global's chief economist noted recently here, the basis trade today represents about $800 billion and growing, so it's not insignificant at all. But to your point about China and other countries dumping US bonds, I think that's a great observation as well. I'll give a shout out to Matt Argersinger who earlier today, he noted on our website that traditionally, larger buyers of those treasuries, countries like China and Japan, they obviously have been prime targets of the tariffs, and it could materialize where these countries decide to unload those bonds and unload those bonds, prices go down, yields go up, and now all of a sudden, we're stuck in a little bit more of a tricky interest rate environment, which then begs the question, what does the Fed do? Going back to what I was giving you kudos for at the very beginning there, it is a very complex situation with a lot of different outcomes.

Ricky Mulvey: I'm sure it's a busy day for Jerome Powell. Speaking of institutional investors, I think it's important for all investors to zoom out on what's going on right now. We talked about the danger of reacting to headlines, but there could be fundamental paradigm shifts happening. We already know about some of them, like artificial intelligence, and Ray Dalio wrote about it in an article on X, spicily titled Don't Make the Mistake Of Thinking That What's Now Happening is Mostly About Tariffs. I got an edit for that headline if he's looking for any.

One idea is that the debt that the US has taken on is unsustainable and that, "It is obviously incongruous to have both large trade imbalances and large capital imbalances in a deglobalizing world in which the major players can't trust that the other major players won't cut them off from the items they need, which is the American worry or pay them the money that they are owed, which is the Chinese worry." Basically, the US has taken on a bunch of debt to buy goods from China, and now that order is getting fundamentally restructured. Dalio can be a perma bear. I'm not saying I'm a smarter investor than him, but that's just an observation. He likes to call a market crash. Any observations about what he wrote in that article or any takes based on what he's saying here?

Jason Moser: Yeah, I get it. I really like reading Ray Dalio's stuff. He can come across as a little more glass half empty at times, I guess. I get where he's coming from, though. I think he makes some really good points here, though, in regard to instability and unsustainability on several fronts. Economic, in the sense of debt levels. I think we all probably agree that our debt levels are unsustainable, you have to figure out a way to crack that code. Domestic political order is very chaotic and very polarizing, to say the least right now, and this certainly then extends out to geopolitics and relationships with other countries. Then the constant evolution of technology and how that's changing our lives and careers. I think he raises a lot of great points there, things to be concerned with to follow and keep our eyes on. By the same token, I don't think the world is coming to an end, and I think these issues will very likely persist in the future, but hopefully just to a lesser degree.

Ricky Mulvey: We've done a lot of big macro and there's still big macro to talk about. But let's get to some of the individual companies, and one of those is Walmart. I think it was last week or the week before we were talking about, if you're a company that sells stuff and you're importing stuff, why are you issuing guidance right now? You have no idea what's going on. Walmart did that. This is what they said in the press release. I'm going to let you translate it. They said, "The company expects Q1 sales growth to continue to be in line with its 3-4% outlook in annual sales and operating income growth, guidance remains unchanged. The range of outcomes for Q1 operating income growth has widened due to less favorable category mix, higher casualty claims expense, and the desire to maintain flexibility, to invest in price as tariffs are implemented." The headlines we're seeing on this is that Walmart is cutting guidance, but that doesn't seem to be entirely true. What's Walmart telling Wall Street here?

Jason Moser: Well, I think Walmart is telling Wall Street that they are unsure as to how the costs of doing business are ultimately going to impact their bottom line. I think, in regard to Walmart and how they get their stuff, their supply chain, I think it's important to note that, I mean, it's estimated that about 60-70% of Walmart's globally sourced products actually come from China. Now, if you go one layer down, that figure could be close to 70-80% of merchandise sold in the actual US and so the US is even a little bit more susceptible to that. That's not surprising. Walmart is very dependent on China in regard to their supply chain. But by the same token, Walmart plays a very interesting role in the global economy, clearly here domestically, but globally as well. I think that this is a situation, we see these situations a lot where companies enter these stretches, some fare way better than others. But these are situations where I think the strong can get even stronger. I thought it was really interesting to see that Walmart shares were actually up 5% on this release.

Now, that was before the 90 day delay headline just came out. Now Walmart shares are up 10%, which that's a big move for a stock like this. There was just a noteworthy conference from Chief Financial Officer John Rainey said in an investor presentation here, that he believes that the company emerges with greater share when it leans in to periods of economic uncertainty, and that goes back to my point of the strong only gets stronger because they have the scale to deal with this situation. They can take a little bit of a hit on pricing in the near term in order to gain share in the long term and if you take that to the Nth degree years ago, that's what Amazon did, that was their playbook. We're going to lose money to gain share because we know 10, 20 years down the road, it's going to be the share that matters, and that's ultimately what's going to help us make money. Walmart obviously is a little bit of an older business than Amazon, but I think they're still playing a little bit from that playbook there and so it doesn't surprise me to see the market receiving Walmart's news the way it is because typically, when you see companies get out there and withdraw guidance, much less cut guidance, the market doesn't typically receive it very well, but today, we're seeing George Costanza, it's the opposite.

Ricky Mulvey: The Seinfeld references are in full force right now. To put that in context, Walmart jumps 10%. It's more than a $700 billion company. That means that the jump just today is the entire market cap of Kroger, which is one of its larger grocery competitors.

Jason Moser: It's pretty astounding.

Ricky Mulvey: Just on this announcement, it is a wild time to be an investor. I don't have anything smart to say on that. Big banks are kicking off earning season this week, and you can be sure that a lot of the Wall Street analysts are going to be looking, Jason, for clarity, clarity on what's going on. The poor corporate executives, very poor, we should feel bad for them, it's going to be cloudy outlooks, lot of questions for these retailers, really for any company. When you're looking through the earnings transcripts that are about to come out, what are you going to be control fing for? What are the terms? What are you looking to see from the companies you follow as earning season kicks off?

Jason Moser: First and foremost, for me, it's going to be the R word, recession. I think the main reason why I say that is because now all of a sudden, we're seeing a lot of these banking leaders come out and really start calling for the likelihood of us entering a recession if we're not already in a recession. We saw Larry Fink say something to that extent the other day, Jamie Dimon came out and said that here recently, Morgan Stanley saying basically the same thing. I think, to me, it's going to be very interesting to see how these leaders feel about the economy and a recession. Then ultimately, it's the relationship that the Fed plays with this because there is this notion, I'm not saying this is what's happening, but there is this notion that the Trump administration is trying to force the Fed's hand into cutting rates a little bit and that has played into some of the decision making here. I'm not saying that's the case, but I'm saying that's a notion that's out there, and it'll be very interesting to see if they have anything to say about that, as well. But for me, I think the recession talk is going to be what'll be top of mind for a lot of folks.

Ricky Mulvey: For me, it's going to be supply chain, right before this recording. Let's say I'm Nike, and I make more than half of my shoes in Vietnam, and these tariffs, this 46% tariff that was previously going to come into effect in Vietnam, maybe I'm thinking about opening a factory in the United States of America. Now I've got a 90 day pause. What am I going to be doing about this capital investment that is hot and cold, yes and no, in and out? Are companies really going to bring more manufacturing to the United States given the unevenness of these announcements and trade disputes?

Jason Moser: Yeah, I think that's a great question. It seems like that's clearly a part of this. It's about reassuring and attempting to bring manufacturing back to the US, which I think is a great long term goal. I think we'd all probably be on board with that. But that's not something that happens overnight either. If that is something that's really steering this ship, that takes a while and really that, I think, adds to a lot of uncertainty, particularly when it seems like the headlines change every single day.

Ricky Mulvey: I want to finish off by talking about one company I know you follow closely, one I've started to take more of a look at because it seems like people are getting more negative on it, and that's Adobe. Now trades at about 16 times free cash flow, and that was before whatever happened during this recording. Also has a $25 billion share repurchase authorization, which is a lot. I think the total market cap is around $140-ish billion. There's a storyline that companies are going to cut back spending, maybe some of their subscription software that they offer is going to get steam rolled by AI. Who needs Photoshop when you can just have AI edit your photo, that kind of thing?

Jason Moser: That's true.

Ricky Mulvey: But as we close out, maybe, how are you looking for any opportunities right now, any thoughts on Adobe? Just for me as your colleague and co-worker looking at stocks.

Jason Moser: Well, as your colleague, Ricky, I will say I'm also an Adobe shareholder and I've recommended the stock and our services as well. It's a company that I'm still fond of and I still believe in. AI has been a big point of conversation with many of us on the investing team when it comes to Adobe. That said, it's not like they aren't chasing that opportunity, they most certainly are. Anecdotally, people I speak with who use these tools like them a lot. But it's clearly a much more competitive market for digital content and creation. Adobe is going to have to work to maintain its position in the market and figure out ways to grow it.

As I said, it's one I own personally and I intend to continue holding. But I think for investors, it's just keeping an eye on signs that they are losing meaningful share. If we see signs that that's happening, then we need to reassess. The company's still growing the top line at a double digit rate and they continue to bring even more down to the bottom line, which is encouraging. Makes a ton of cash, the balance sheet is still in very good shape with plenty of cash in low rate long term debt that staggered out nicely. As you said, they continue to utilize that cash to buy back shares, and they bring that share account down. I think it's just going to be paying attention to how sticky that subscriber base remains because that's one of the great parts about Adobe historically as an investment is this sticky subscriber base. But as the market becomes more competitive and there are more options out there, you have to ask yourself, are there really switching costs? I don't know, we're going to find out here, I think, soon enough. But I like the things that they're doing and I'm willing to give this company some leash here to let them go do their thing.

As far as other companies, I've not changed my investing behavior really at all through this. I haven't sold anything, I've continued to invest by virtue of just making sure my paycheck is contributing to my 401K, and I'm investing in my Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund there. Individual stocks, I've come to find, and this is really one of the greater lessons David Gardner's ever taught me, it's I'm really only interested in these companies that I already own. I like adding to positions that have done very well for me through the years and I think of companies like Home Depot and UPS on the dividend side, for example, where those share prices are depressed, but these are long term successful businesses. On the growth side, I look toward companies like Shopify and Exxon Enterprise as examples of companies would be very happy to add to those positions as well. But I'm taking it very slow. Like I said, back, the beginning of the show there we're doing the opposite of what Silicon Valley does, Ricky. We're not breaking things fast, we're not moving fast and breaking things. I'm going to take it slow and make sure we don't let our emotions.

Ricky Mulvey: He's an expert on imports and exports. Art Vandelay I appreciate you being here. Thank you for your time and insight.

Jason Moser: You got it, happy to be here.

Ricky Mulvey: As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. While personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and are not approved by advertisers, the Motley Fool only picks products that it would personally recommend to friends like you. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.