Supreme Court refuses Blackrock’s appeal on tax relief of 2009 Barclays deal

cityam
05 Nov 2024

The highest court in the country refused to hear Blackrock’s appeal after it lost its case against the tax agency over its 2009 acquisition of Barclays Global Investors..

A structure by the Blackrock Group, Blackrock Holdco 5, LLC, was the topic of a Court of Appeal hearing in March, as it sought to appeal a decision that sided with HMRC.

The legal case stemmed from the structure used to acquire the North American investment management business of Barclays Global Investors (BGI) from Barclays Bank in December 2009.

Blackrock acquired BGI for approximately $13.5bn (£10.4bn), comprising $6.6bn in cash and the balance in shares in the asset manager giant.

Blackrock Holdco 5, LLC is Delaware-incorporated but it’s a UK tax resident company. It was used to issue loan notes to its parental entity in the Blackrock group totalling $4bn.

The loan notes were issued in return for the loan Holdco 5 LLC received from its parent, Blackrock Holdco 4, LLC and were a form of intra-group financing.

HMRC disallowed a tax deduction for LLC5, but its first challenge to the deduction failed at the First Tier Tribunal (FTT), as the FTT ruled that whilst there was a tax avoidance purpose for entering into the loan arrangement, there was also a commercial purpose.

However, the tax agency appealed this decision to the Upper Tribunal, which sided with HMRC in 2022.

Blackrock took this decision to the Court of Appeal, but in April, the court dismissed Blackrock’s appeal. Speaking at the time, a spokesperson for asset manager said it “has paid all of its UK corporation tax, including the payment some time ago of all tax due in relation to this matter”.

The asset manager added that it was “closely evaluating our next steps”. Those next steps included trying to take this case to the UK Supreme Court.

According to the Supreme Court’s decisions on October’s permissions to appeal, it refused Blackrock’s application on 13 October.

The court reasons that permission to appeal was refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law.

City AM approached Blackrock and HMRC for a comment.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10