To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nam Cheong Limited (SGX:1MZ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
While insiders, who own 38% shares weren’t spared from last week’s S$18m market cap drop, individual investors as a group suffered the maximum losses
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Nam Cheong, beginning with the chart below.
View our latest analysis for Nam Cheong
SGX:1MZ Ownership Breakdown January 15th 2025
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nam Cheong. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nam Cheong, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
SGX:1MZ Earnings and Revenue Growth January 15th 2025
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Nam Cheong. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Nam Cheong's case, its Top Key Executive, Su Tiong, is the largest shareholder, holding 28% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Seng Keat Leong is the owner of 3.5% of the company's shares.
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Nam Cheong Limited. Insiders own S$57m worth of shares in the S$151m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
With a 44% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nam Cheong. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.7%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nam Cheong better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Nam Cheong (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.