Is Deepseek more an attack on Wall Street than an AI innovation?

cityam
30 Jan
HONG KONG, CHINA – JANUARY 28: In this photo illustration, the DeepSeek logo is seen on a phone in front of a flag of China on January 28, 2025 in Hong Kong, China. Global tech stocks have plummeted following the emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup that has developed a competitive AI model at a fraction of the cost of its US rivals, sparking concerns about the high valuations of tech giants like Nvidia. This development has led to significant declines in tech shares across Asia and Europe, with markets in both regions experiencing notable losses as investors reassess the AI landscape and its potential impact on the industry’s future. (Photo illustration by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images)

The launch of Deepseek has been framed as the AI race’s Sputnik but the timing is dubious and questions are being asked about whether the tech is really as game-changing as its creators claim. Either way, America must stay vigilant, says Mark Minevich

It started with a single, seismic headline: China builds an AI model for just $6m.

The claim seemed almost too bold to be true. In an era where Western AI giants pour billions into training their latest large language models (LLMs), the number felt impossible – an engineered disruption, a bombshell lobbed directly at the heart of Silicon Valley’s AI dominance.

At the centre of the storm: Liang Wenfeng, the enigmatic founder of Deepseek, China’s rising AI powerhouse. A hedge fund veteran turned AI visionary, Wenfeng wasn’t just announcing a technical breakthrough – he was setting off a financial and geopolitical earthquake.

But behind Deepseek stands an even more intriguing player: High-Flyer (HF), a Chinese quant hedge fund that doesn’t just invest in AI but actively manipulates markets, plays financial war games and has a history of regulatory violations.

The market reaction was swift and brutal. Nvidia plunged nearly 17 per cent in a single day, erasing $593bn in market value – one of the largest single-day losses in stock market history. TSMC fell 14 per cent, dragging semiconductor and chip-related stocks down with it. AI infrastructure and tech stocks followed suit, with companies tied to cloud computing, data centres, and GPU supply chains experiencing heavy sell-offs.

A coordinated financial manoeuvre?

The shock wasn’t just about Deepseek’s AI model itself – it was about what it represented. Almost immediately, speculation erupted that this wasn’t just an AI breakthrough – it was a coordinated financial manoeuvre.

Multiple sources on social media, including X, claimed that High-Flyer used $600-800m to short US equities in the days leading up to Deepseek’s announcement. If true, this means they could have made $6-8bn in profits in just one day. 

Deepseek’s announcement didn’t just shake tech stocks – it forced Wall Street to question the AI bubble itself. Can AI investment remain sustainable if China claims it can achieve similar results for a fraction of the cost? Are Nvidia’s massive valuations still justified? If AI development costs plummet, will current business models survive?

For months, investors had been pouring billions into AI stocks, assuming that AI’s inevitable progress would drive massive, long-term profits. But Deepseek’s claim forced the market to reassess its assumptions overnight.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10