The European Union (EU) has granted approval to 10 stablecoin issuers under its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, notably excluding Tether, the issuer of USDT. This decision has sparked discussions about the EU's regulatory approach and its potential impact on the cryptocurrency market, particularly the implications for Tether after its exclusion. Here are more details, starting with details concerning the MiCA regulations, its importance for the EU and the global crypto market, and the approved stablecoins issuers. Followed by some expert analysis on this move for the stablecoins, the cryptocurrencies' future, and the future of the EU crypto market.
The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulations are a comprehensive regulatory framework introduced by the European Union (EU) to oversee crypto assets, including stablecoins, utility tokens, and crypto service providers. MiCA aims to establish clear legal guidelines, protect investors, and promote financial stability while fostering innovation in the digital asset market.
MiCA is expected to reshape the European crypto market by enforcing compliance, ensuring stability, and limiting the dominance of unregulated stablecoins.
On February 20, 2025, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) released a list of 10 firms authorized to issue stablecoins within the EU under the MiCA framework. These firms include Banking Circle, Circle, Crypto.com, Fiat Republic, Membrane Finance, Quantoz Payments, Schuman Financial, Societe Generale, StabIR, and Stable Mint. Collectively, they have introduced 10 euro-pegged stablecoins and five U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins. Conspicuously absent from this list is Tether, the world's largest stablecoin by market capitalization, exceeding $141 billion.
The omission of Tether from the approved list has led to significant consequences within the EU's cryptocurrency landscape. Prior to the MiCA compliance deadline in December 2024, several crypto platforms began delisting USDT and other non-compliant U.S.-pegged stablecoins for EU users. Tether criticized these actions, describing them as "rushed and unwarranted."
Industry experts have expressed concerns that MiCA's stringent regulations might isolate the European crypto market. Natalia Łątka, Director of Public Policy and Regulatory Affairs at Merkle Science, warned that such regulations could deter foreign firms from operating in the region and might prompt local crypto companies to relocate to more lenient jurisdictions.
The EU's proactive stance on crypto regulation aims to provide oversight and consumer protection. However, critics argue that excessive regulation could stifle innovation and economic growth. Professor Steve Hanke has pointed to overregulation as a contributing factor to the EU's slower GDP growth compared to the United States.
The MiCA framework imposes strict conditions on stablecoin issuers, raising questions about whether these measures will stabilize the market or limit competition. While supporters believe that MiCA offers much-needed regulatory clarity, detractors fear it may create bureaucratic hurdles that push innovation outside the EU.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.