MW Women's March Madness teams are being paid for the first time - but they're splitting $200 million less than the men

By Weston Blasi

Players won't receive any of the prize money themselves, but their schools' basketball programs and athletic departments reap the rewards

March Madness is back and forecast to bring in almost $1 billion in revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. And this year, women's basketball teams are getting a piece of that NCAA action for the first time - but not as much as on the men's side.

The brackets for the tournament celebrating the best of men's and women's college basketball are set, and fans are looking forward to 67 games packed into 21 days in one of the biggest U.S. sporting events of the year. March Madness is also one of the most lucrative events for the NCAA, whose revenue jumped to a record $1.38 billion in the 2024 fiscal year, according to the organization's most recent financial statement, with a large portion of that coming from the men's basketball tournament.

Read more: Women's NCAA tournament: UCLA is top seed, joined by South Carolina, USC, Texas

Yet while men's teams have been paid for March Madness since 1991, the women's teams, since their first NCAA tournament in 1982, haven't been compensated.

'The best single way you can support equality and equity is by literally tuning in to women's games.'Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross

The NCAA didn't prioritize selling TV rights for the women's tournament for many years - and only allowed the women's tournament to begin using "March Madness" branding in 2022 - because of the perceived relative lack of audience interest. But recent tournaments' television ratings and the recent star power associated with the sport (hat tips to Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese) have led the NCAA to update its payout policy to include women's teams.

To be clear, NCAA policy doesn't allow for individual players to be paid directly by the organization or by member schools. These payments are meant for participating teams - that is, schools - and not individual players. The payments, which can be thought of as prize money, are calculated based on how far a team makes it in the tournament, among other factors and coefficients called "performance units."

But, like other aspects of college sports, there is disparity on the March Madness court. The men's tournament is expected to award hundreds of millions of dollars to its participating schools, while the women's tournament will distribute an estimated $15 million this year, per the Associated Press. This disparity is mainly due to the TV media-rights deals, with the men's bracket still attracting significantly more money.

More: Men's March Madness brackets are out. Here's who's favored to win it all.

Here's how it breaks down: A vast majority of the NCAA's revenue comes from broadcast deals. CBS and TNT Sports - owned by Paramount Global (PARA) and Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (WBD), respectively - pay an average of about $1.1 billion a year to broadcast the men's tournament, while ESPN - owned by Walt Disney Co. $(DIS)$ - has broadcast rights to the women's tournament, for which it pays about $65 million per year. These are long-term TV deals - with the NCAA, CBS and TNT Sports most recently inking an eight-year extension to their previous 14-year deal for the men's tournament, which now runs through 2032.

"Historically, the NCAA made all its money by selling the men's March Madness TV rights - about a billion dollars a year - and they didn't even bother to individually price anything else out," Victor Matheson, an economics professor at the College of the Holy Cross who specializes in sports, told MarketWatch. "It's a gigantic difference."

The NCAA will initially pay the women's March Madness teams 26% of the TV deal, which is the same percentage that the men's teams got in the first year after performance units were introduced (1991). That comes out to $15 million in prize money, which will increase to $25 million, or 41% of the revenue, by 2028, according to the AP.

The men's March Madness selectees, meanwhile, now get 24% of the media-rights deal in prize money, which comes out to approximately $216 million, according to the NCAA's financial statements and reporting from the AP.

"[What] economists mean [by] equal pay for equal work, it's not as if a tournament that draws a lot more viewers should be paid as much as players in a tournament that has less viewers, but that they are treated the same in terms of percentages," said Matheson.

The NCAA did not respond to request for comment.

See: These 10 college athletes are making over $1 million a year in NIL deals

The women's March Madness system mirrors the men's basketball performance-unit program. Each of the 32 conferences with an automatic bid earns one unit, with additional units awarded for teams securing at-large bids in the 68-team bracket. So a team advancing to the Final Four could generate around $1.26 million for its conference over the next three years through financial performance rewards.

Tournament payouts will be sent out to schools' conferences and then filtered down to university athletic departments, and not directly to the players, the NCAA said. So even a long tournament run for, say, UConn star guard Paige Bueckers still won't directly lead to any payout for her. Rather, the money will go toward funding the University of Connecticut's sports programs and covering expenses like travel, facilities, coaching salaries, scholarships and other costs.

College players can still get paid separately though name, image and likeness deals, of course. Payments for those agreements do not come directly from schools or the NCAA, and instead come from businesses and donor-funded NIL collectives.

In addition to Bueckers, the top women's basketball talent gearing up for March Madness includes the University of Southern California's JuJu Watkins and Louisiana State University's Flau'jae Johnson.

The women's bracket will look to keep up the historic momentum of last year's tournament. For the first time ever, the 2024 NCAA women's championship game had better ratings than the men's title game. The men's championship game between UConn and Purdue averaged 14.82 million viewers, compared with the 18.87 million who watched South Carolina defeat Caitlin Clark and Iowa in the women's final.

In fact, the 2024 women's tournament broke viewership records across the board. The Elite Eight, Final Four and championship rounds all reached new ratings highs for women's March Madness. The South Carolina-Iowa title game was the most viewed women's basketball game in history and the most watched basketball game - men's or women's, college or professional - since 2019.

But, despite the record viewership and heightened overall interest, the pay disparity between men's and women's teams won't close much in the near term. That's because, like its men's basketball TV deal, the NCAA's TV deal with ESPN - which grants the broadcaster exclusive rights to 40 championships across college sports, including women's basketball - runs through 2032.

"If the trends we are seeing continue, those [money] gaps are going to shrink over time," Matheson said. "The best single way you can support equality and equity is by literally tuning in to women's games."

The March Madness brackets were set Sunday, with UCLA, South Carolina, Southern California and Texas earning top seeds in the women's tournament, while Auburn, Duke, Houston and Florida nabbed No. 1 seeds on the men's side.

Read on: Taylor Swift has made the NFL almost $1 billion since she started dating Travis Kelce

-Weston Blasi

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

March 17, 2025 08:43 ET (12:43 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.