Bitcoin Mining Costs Jump To $137,000 Per Coin When Accounting For Non-Cash Expenses: CoinShares

Benzinga
11 hours ago

Bitcoin BTC/USD mining expenses rose sharply in the final quarter of 2024, with CoinShares reporting that the total average cost to produce one Bitcoin, including non-cash items, climbed to $137,018.

This figure includes depreciation and stock-based compensation, offering a more comprehensive look at the financial stress facing miners despite the strength in Bitcoin's market price.

What Happened: According to CoinShares’ Q4 2024 Mining Report, the weighted average cash cost to produce a Bitcoin among publicly listed miners jumped 47% quarter-over-quarter, from $55,950 in Q3 to $82,162 in Q4.

Excluding outliers like Hut 8 HUT, which saw costs skewed by a large deferred tax expense, the cash cost averaged $75,767.

Despite the rising cost base, most miners remained marginally profitable, with Bitcoin trading around $82,000 throughout Q4.

However, the inclusion of non-cash expenses, such as accelerated depreciation of mining equipment and stock compensation, paints a more complex and potentially concerning picture for the industry.

The $137,018 total average cost represents a significant gap between headline profitability and actual financial sustainability when all expenses are factored in.

ASIC Depreciation And Competitive Pressures

A major driver of these costs is the fast-paced depreciation cycle of ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) hardware, which must be frequently upgraded to remain competitive.

Unlike gold mining equipment, which maintains utility over long periods, Bitcoin mining hardware quickly becomes obsolete, forcing firms into continuous reinvestment.

"This dynamic results in a unique financial strain," the CoinShares report noted. "Miners are trapped in an ‘ASIC hamster wheel'—a constant need to replace hardware driven not by wear and tear, but by technological obsolescence."

The report adds that Bitcoin mining economics differ materially from gold mining, which typically features more stable production forecasts and longer depreciation timelines.

In contrast, Bitcoin mining outcomes are strongly influenced by the actions of competitors: if one miner increases capacity, others’ relative output can decline, even without changes to their operations.

Hashrate Acceleration And Forward Guidance

Despite these mounting expenses, Bitcoin's network hashrate reached a record 900 exahashes per second (Eh/s) at the end of 2024, slightly ahead of CoinShares' previous projections.

The firm now expects the network to breach the 1 zettahash per second (Zh/s) mark by July 2025, with hashrate forecast to reach 2.0 Zh/s by early 2027.

CoinShares attributes the increase to strong price action and favorable policy developments, which motivated miners to accelerate infrastructure deployments despite rising capital and operational costs.

Also Read: TRUMP Meme Coin Surges 15% As Organizers Clarify Participation Rules For Gala Dinner

Structural Challenges And Industry Shifts

CoinShares notes that the mining sector is becoming increasingly saturated, with valuation multiples compressing across publicly listed firms.

This reflects growing consensus that Bitcoin mining is now a zero-sum game, where gains in hashrate by one miner come at the direct expense of another's market share.

In response, several miners, including Core Scientific CORZ and Cipher Mining CIFR, have begun diversifying into AI infrastructure and high-performance computing (HPC) services, attempting to build more stable and scalable revenue streams.

CORZ has already committed 43% of its energy capacity to AI-related operations, with CIFR planning to allocate 35% of its future buildout in that direction.

Miners With Cost Reductions

While most miners saw higher costs in Q4, CleanSpark CORZ, Iren IREN and Cormint were exceptions.

They managed to reduce their cost of revenue per Bitcoin mined by 8%, 39%, and 44%, respectively, through fleet efficiency improvements, increased uptime, and lower energy prices.

  • CleanSpark reduced costs by boosting uptime from 94% to 98%, and improving efficiency from 22 J/TH to 18 J/TH.
  • Cormint benefited from lower power prices, dropping to 1.8¢/kWh, and operating discipline that allowed scale benefits to flow to the bottom line.
  • Iren significantly expanded its Childress facility, boosting hashrate and cutting net electricity cost per BTC by 39%.

Economic Context And Geopolitical Trends

CoinShares also contextualized the mining landscape within broader macroeconomic and geopolitical trends.

Several U.S. states, including Arizona, Oklahoma, and Texas, are actively exploring state-level strategic Bitcoin reserves, potentially contributing over $10 billion in cumulative buying pressure at current prices.

Meanwhile, tariff policies on imported mining rigs, ranging from 24% to 54%, may weigh on miner profitability in Q2 2025, particularly for those dependent on older or less efficient hardware.

Despite macro uncertainty and tighter margins, CoinShares maintains that Bitcoin's store-of-value narrative remains intact, especially as U.S. trade partners adopt more accommodative policies in the face of inflationary pressures.

The report concludes that while mining is becoming more capital-intensive and competitive, its unique positioning across energy, compute, and financial infrastructure makes it an asset class to watch.

Read Next:

  • Bitcoin Fundamentally Decoupled From US Tech Stocks, BlackRock’s Jay Jacobs Says

Image: Shutterstock

$BTCBitcoin
$94485.110.49%

Stock Score Locked: Want to See it?

Benzinga Rankings give you vital metrics on any stock – anytime.

Reveal Full Score
Edge Rankings
Momentum
92.27
Price Trend
Short
Medium
Long
Overview
CIFRCipher Mining Inc
$3.103.50%
CORZCore Scientific Inc
$8.188.57%
HUTHut 8 Corp
$13.474.42%
$6.533.65%
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10